Read the following excerpt from Aristotle's Poetics and discuss the Essay

Read the following excerpt from Aristotles Poetics and discuss the respects in which the Medea adheres to his guidelines and - Essay Example*** The Third end of Medea contains all the elements necessary, from Aristotles point of view, for a play to be called a tragedy. Among others these include, Jasons mimesis, dialogues, structure of the plot, peripeteia. A nonher evidence of tragedian character of Euripides play is a scope of pain. In the Third Episode we can see the mimesis when Medea repeats Jasons wrong doings in burning desire to revenge on him and make him suffer. She makes a plan how to force Jason to suffer as much as Medea did felt when he has broken his oath. So here we can observe one of the of import elements of a tragedy according to Aristotle. Another key element of a classical tragedy is dialogue, which Medea uses when speaking to Aegeus and asking him to Swear by the Earth on which you tread/Swear by the Sun, my fathers father dread/Swear by every god and godhead to always defend her. This comment is a dialogue as it said in a highly poetic, elevated tone. Peripeteia of this tragedy also purely corresponds to Aristotles requirements stated in the Poetics. ... In Euripides tragedy there is too much suffering, due to this reason Aristotle called Euripides the most tragic of the playwrights. Here we can observe sufferings when Jason sees his sons blood seeping from low the door. It was Medeas plane to make him suffer with this purpose she killed her children, the only part of Jason she still had. She wanted to get rid of him completely and at the same eon to make him feel grief and agony. The Third Episode of the tragedy shows vividly all the elements in which Euripides Medea adheres to Aristotles guidelines. So, Medea represents a classic tragedy and can be taken as an example for analysis. In spite of the fact that Aristotle himself considered Medea to be one of the best samples of classical tragedy, Euripides masterpiece contains a few elements which do not satisfy Aristotles views. For example, Aristotle reproached Euripides for partiality to the method of God from the machine, which consists in the fact that the mishap does not escape from the plot, but is achieved with gods help. Aristotle wrote ... the denouement of the plot should follow from the plot, but not, as in Medea, through the machine. And if the denouement of the conflict so often required the sudden appearance of supernatural forces, thusly it was not due to Euripides inability to find a more convincing composite course, but due to the fact that the poet had not seen in contemporary arena solutions for many intricate human affairs. The poet is abhorrent to every theatrical convention. According to Aristotle, a real tragedy, arousing in the viewer sympathy and fear, makes discharging of these affects, directing them into